susandennis: (Default)
[personal profile] susandennis
So I figured out how to make YouTube do the Box like thing...

What do we think? Is one better/faster/prettier/easier/ any other 'er' than the other?



or

(no subject)

Date: 2007-11-17 01:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pisceandreamer.livejournal.com
Both look and work fine for me - go with whichever one you like best!

(no subject)

Date: 2007-11-17 01:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] roadskoller.livejournal.com
I'm just hilariously happy that I'm not on dial up anymore and can see this.But...Youtube worked bette.
And I'm going to send it to my little sister.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-11-17 02:18 am (UTC)
kyrielle: Middle-aged woman in profile, black and white, looking left, with a scarf around her neck and a white background (Default)
From: [personal profile] kyrielle
I like the YouTube one better. I have been not-looking at videos because the 'box' one doesn't look like it plays in place, it looks like thumbnails and those I expect to open another page. I tried it just now and it doesn't, but it led me to think it would. The YouTube one made it clear that it would play in place. Also, if I want to stop in the middle of a video and look at another, I can do that with YouTube but not with box, which completely removes the list until the end of the video, when you can get back to it.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-11-17 03:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sea-weed.livejournal.com
My computer seems to like youtube better!

(no subject)

Date: 2007-11-17 04:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tedder42.livejournal.com
Definitely prefer Youtube. It loads easier for me (in Firefox Windows).

You've inspired me, I have photos to post and clips to edit of our little kitty..

(no subject)

Date: 2007-11-17 04:39 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] artisanal_xara
I HATE YouTube, and I like Box from what I've seen of your stuff. I do have to admit that the YouTube interface is nicer. I still think the picture quality is nicer in Box. I don't know, I guess my feelings are mixed.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-11-17 05:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seattlejo.livejournal.com
Whichever works better for you!

(no subject)

Date: 2007-11-17 07:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steve98052.livejournal.com
The picture and sound quality was better on Box, at least it was on this computer (a 2 GB laptop with shared-memory video). I haven't compared on the other computers yet.

The Youtube interface is more familiar, because so much stuff is posted there, but it's a clunky familiar interface.

hrm

Date: 2007-11-17 08:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] henare.livejournal.com
box worked fine for me. didn't try the youtube. both youtube and livejournal are banned at my office and i had meant to try box there today but i forgot. (i carry a laptop with a WWAN card to get around this nonsense).

(until these videos i didn't realize you had a voice!)
Edited Date: 2007-11-17 08:47 am (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2007-11-17 08:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rev-hank.livejournal.com
I really like the youtube one better. I like the fancy blue box and the way it just plays all the videos one right after the other.

Youtube

Date: 2007-11-17 01:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spiritgirl.livejournal.com
Youtube for looks, quicker loading, easy to understand....but the box is a great backup if Youtube gets annoying or something. LOVE watching the cats and hearing your voice.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-11-18 06:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bemocked.livejournal.com
I also like the youTube option a little more... the more animated box interface is a little to busy/distracting

Profile

susandennis: (Default)
Susan Dennis

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit