Very interesting....
Oct. 17th, 2003 07:25 pmI just found this in the comment section of one of today's entries. I thought it was interesting enough to promote to an entry. I'm going to set aside the whole issue of anonymous posting, because, honestly, especially when posing a dissenting opinion, I think it's just too lame.
But The Commenter clearly has me nailed and he/she is right about the foreclosure on my condo. I did not pay that bill. I tried. I offered to pay more than 90% of it in a lump sum with the rest as I got it. The bank told me that a bad debt was worth more to them. And I still do think it's fairly ironic that while I must be on their books as a deadbeat, they continue to spend major bucks to regain my business.
And I'm totally missing how this relates to my trying to collect on money owed me. I'm not interested in a bad debt. I am resigned to getting only some or even none of the money owed me. Doesn't mean I won't fight for it. I'm just not seeing a lot of correlation here. But, then, sometimes I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer. But I'm happy to be a complete something and hypocrite is probably as good as any.
-----------------------------------------
Subject: Interesting.
Your journal is in the friend's pages of a buddy of mine, so I read your posts occasionally. I don't use LiveJournal, I don't have intention of starting some discussion with you, and my name is none of your business.
That said, I want to remind everyone that not too long ago, you posted about not defaulting on a loan for a condo you were buying in California several years ago. You even thought it was funny that the bank that had loaned you the money was sending you letters offering you loans at a higher rate than the loan you have on your current condo.
Really, you come off as a complete hypocrite. But, that's just my opinion, even if it is right.
-----------------------------------------

(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-17 07:46 pm (UTC)Dare I say that if this commenter as any debt at all, his label of "hypocrite" falls right back on his face. He didn't know the whole story, yet felt the need to comment on things he did not fully comprehend. Pathetic.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-17 08:04 pm (UTC)Guess that I've been lucky so far and not had an anonymous posting to my journal.
But, even if a post is anonymous....doesn't the person's IP address show?
Hmmmm
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-17 08:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-17 08:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-17 08:08 pm (UTC)Feh, the bank made clear what they wanted in the business-negotiation, and why. That's no reason to start allowing defaulting on your loans.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-17 08:11 pm (UTC)"I don't use LiveJournal, I don't have intention of starting some discussion with you, and my name is none of your business"
None of YOUR business? Susan, you are one of the most OPEN,sincere and totally unpretentious posters I've ever read. It's OK for them to occasionally read all about you, know your name, yet their name is NONE of your business? How rude.
What's even more interesting than a lame anonymous poster is one who manages to take their time and read yours, and even remember such DETAILS about it.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-17 08:43 pm (UTC)I agree there. That is obviously someone that is almost stalking. Very weird.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-17 11:26 pm (UTC)Anyone who doesn't have the gumption to post their name and then proceeds to slate you is a tosser!
:)
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-18 04:28 am (UTC)Even at this distance I feel a sufficiently good judge of character to be sure that unethical behaviour is as foreign to you as......well, this creep ! Love and solidarity from Bill& Ian.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-18 07:21 am (UTC)Why are some people such fuck-chops.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-18 09:37 am (UTC)