Give me your worst
Oct. 21st, 2016 06:24 pmThis journal is to record my life for the recording not for the audience, but every once in a while, I write to an audience. This is such an entry.
I'd like your help.
brendamom left a comment that she thought my posing my finances* was displaying too much information. And I'm curious about this. Sincerely.
I totally get that most people think of privacy as keeping everything about themselves as a giant secret. I'm not one of those people. I actually never have been. But, I am thoughtful about it. I do think about it. What is the risk? What is the harm?
If I post my address, what's the danger? I live on the 4th floor of a secured building. Yes, someone could sneak in the building's front door and somehow pick my unit out of the other 20 on this floor and pick the lock and get me, but I'm totally willing to risk that. Also, someone could scale the outside of the building and break in from my terrace. Again, I'm ok with those chances.
If I post my telephone number, people could call me. My telephone number - the same number I use today - for years was listed in the Seattle phone books. And, if anyone still has one of those, it probably still is in there - listed under my full name - Susan Dennis. Yep, I might get a prank call. Since I don't answer the phone unless I know who it is, that's not a problem for me.
If I post my income and what I spend my money on, what's the harm? What's the danger? What's the worst? I can't come up with anything myself. But, I'll bet someone reading this might have a list. Do you? Will you share? Please?
*I have posted my income and my spending this month in entries that I made 'friends only'. I'm seriously considering making them public. Frankly, the responses to this entry will likely dictate if/when I do.
I'd like your help.
I totally get that most people think of privacy as keeping everything about themselves as a giant secret. I'm not one of those people. I actually never have been. But, I am thoughtful about it. I do think about it. What is the risk? What is the harm?
If I post my address, what's the danger? I live on the 4th floor of a secured building. Yes, someone could sneak in the building's front door and somehow pick my unit out of the other 20 on this floor and pick the lock and get me, but I'm totally willing to risk that. Also, someone could scale the outside of the building and break in from my terrace. Again, I'm ok with those chances.
If I post my telephone number, people could call me. My telephone number - the same number I use today - for years was listed in the Seattle phone books. And, if anyone still has one of those, it probably still is in there - listed under my full name - Susan Dennis. Yep, I might get a prank call. Since I don't answer the phone unless I know who it is, that's not a problem for me.
If I post my income and what I spend my money on, what's the harm? What's the danger? What's the worst? I can't come up with anything myself. But, I'll bet someone reading this might have a list. Do you? Will you share? Please?
*I have posted my income and my spending this month in entries that I made 'friends only'. I'm seriously considering making them public. Frankly, the responses to this entry will likely dictate if/when I do.
Privacy
Date: 2016-10-22 02:08 am (UTC)I was taught never to ask how much money someone has, never to ask how much you paid for something, and never to ask how old you are. However, if you volunteer that information that is not for me to say one way or the other that you should or shouldn't.
My email address is somewhat public but I still don't give it to those who want it so badly. Even if they can look it up, I don't give stores that information because they will just use it. I was rather upset with General Motors when I bought a new car because of email. I specifically didn't give them my email address and yet they found it and tried to USE IT.
Privacy is a very mix blessing. In foreign countries like Australia, you telephone listing only has a first initial. You can't look up people like you can here because you don know one S Dennis from another.
We in the US have become very cavalier with our information and then wonder why we get spam and unwanted phone calls.
I am certainly not going to tell you to NOT print the information but don't expect me to be forthcoming with similar information.
Re: Privacy
Date: 2016-10-22 02:10 am (UTC)Cool.
We clearly have different beliefs about money and information and that's cool, too.
(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 03:25 am (UTC)But, I don't think it would increase it much.
It would take a pretty good con person to get a new ID with an address and phone number and nothing else.
As you say, that's in the phone listings. So, really shouldn't change the game.
Seeing your finances might raise the odds of being targeted as there is no information in the phone listings about if it would be worth trying to steal from someone.
This at least gives an indication of what could be stolen.
But, I really think it makes very little difference.
(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 03:29 am (UTC)BUT, thief, if you want to steal the tampons, don't come here. Go to Mary's Place in Belltown :)
(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 09:28 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 01:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 03:26 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 03:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 03:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 04:00 am (UTC)But you may well have just kept me keeping the money entries locked down.
Thanks, lawyer in you. I appreciate it very much.
(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 02:53 pm (UTC)This morning, I thought of one other reason. If you post things like, "Paid cleaning lady $100", you're invading the privacy of the cleaning lady. (I know you don't post her name, but people might be able to piece it together, with the knowledge that she comes from Bosnia, has a daughter who helps her, etc.)
I'm very intrigued by this discussion, and by the various answers you've received!
(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 07:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 04:30 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 04:37 am (UTC)hehehehehehe
(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 04:46 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 04:48 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 05:11 am (UTC)I found the post educational, it gave me another way to think about fiscal responsibility, of which I have very little. And I'm jazzed that you have an IBM pension. When I worked at SeattleOIC, one of the teachers and her husband worked for IBM, and they were seriously secretive about what they earned there, even when they suggested I apply.
(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 01:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-23 01:16 am (UTC)Until I was applying for college aid and *that* almost killed him. I went to college but my mom never got her own house. She rejoiced as each of her four children bought their own homes.
(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-23 01:27 am (UTC)In the early 80's (while I was still at IBM) there was a great article in the Wall Street Journal about two very similar cases that made their way to a high court about the same time. One involved an employee of IBM and the other involved an employee of another company.
I don't remember the details but I do remember they involved privacy. The non-IBM guy lost his case with the court saying the information in question was leaked by his employer was an accident. The IBM guy won his case because the court found that IBM imbued in its employees a sense of privacy that was greater than the common United States citizen!
I was only there 15 years which was a nano second in service time back in those days. So probably not long enough for the secrecy thing to get a good hold.
(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-23 02:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-23 02:16 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 09:30 am (UTC)Seriously, though. I think we're conditioned to be silent and secretive about money for a lot of very BS reasons and that there is a lot to be learned from radical financial transparency. I think it's great that you're posting publicly about this sort of stuff. It helps me at least have a good sense of what responsible use of retirement income looks like!
(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 01:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 03:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 04:28 pm (UTC)(And against you, too! I come from a family with a very unhealthy viewpoint on purchases and what is and is not frivolous -- or, as my hippie mum would say "conspicuous consumption. Watching peers post their financials helps me figure out where my behavior is abnormal -- that there are humans who buy new underpants without agonizing about it for 3 weeks, and that might be healthier than my way. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 05:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 06:24 pm (UTC)It's fascinating to me, too, to learn what others consider necessities and frivolous. Don't look to me for underpants guidance, though, I'm totally always commando. They cost too much and cause more laundry than I'm willing to do!
(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 10:14 am (UTC)One is "security" based but I see nothing that suggests you breached your own security. You didnt specify (say) Wells Fargo bank or the password for your ATM Withdrawals. Nor did you mention broader investments.
The second is "privacy" based and thats obviously a matter of personal choice.
Although I was not this specific, i did make a similar post on LJ about three months ago. The occasion being my wifes retirement and how we were using her "package". But it did (and I cant scroll back for specifics) indicate how we would be living the rest of our lives.
Although there was no breach of "security", indeed one of my obsessions is that I dont do online banking (which I regard as insecure) and I keep no info on any computer.....there was arguably a breach of privacy on my part...after all I was talking about someone elses finances (albeit in general terms).
I always think of Facebook as a place where I say what I think.
And Live Journal as a place to say what I REALLY think.
(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 01:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 12:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 01:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 01:51 pm (UTC)I have always enjoyed your openness and appreciated that you have a comfort about your level of privacy. In a way, I guess it means you don't live in much fear compared to some of us.
As for your finances, it's your choice to share, so I don't believe it's TMI.
But if you start posting your bank account numbers, I'm going to have you committed ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 01:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 02:48 pm (UTC)I suspect that her response comes from a place of concern, fear of the unknown, that feeling dismissed online as "concern trolling."
Thinking of possibilities, though, is it possible that someone online could use all your real info to sign up for things? New accounts in your name and address, etc. I don't know how identity theft actually works, but you're right about basic info being publicly available. I suspect baring financial info just treads into uncomfortably new territory. You're not, after all, sharing your actual account details.
(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 06:28 pm (UTC)The one in Chicago uses it for everything banking, shopping, wedding planning and I even got the documents for her house closing. I know more about her financials than I do my own. I finally wrote her snail mail to let her know. Didn't change a thing. She bought a new dress at Sears last week. I think it's ugly, but apparently she only wants my email address and not my opinion.
(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 05:00 pm (UTC)https://www.theguardian.com/money/blog/2016/apr/11/when-it-comes-to-tax-transparency-norway-leads-the-field (https://www.theguardian.com/money/blog/2016/apr/11/when-it-comes-to-tax-transparency-norway-leads-the-field)
In Moldova where we are now everyone knows how much their friends, neighbours, etc earn. People talk about it all the time freely, even with people they have just met. It is not a taboo question here at all.
(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 06:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 06:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 06:52 pm (UTC)An excellent and valid point!
(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 09:37 pm (UTC)I can't see how anything you have posted up until now could lead to identity theft etc. Frankly, if someone wants that info, they will have better ways to get it than looking in your LJ account.
(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-22 09:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-23 12:10 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-23 07:05 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-23 01:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-10-27 05:23 pm (UTC)As far as finances, I don't see the harm. I'd personally do them as locked (friends only) posts, but I really doubt anyone is stalking any of us through LJ.